GS-4 · Case Studies Based on Public Sector Ethics

201320 marksQ4Confidential Policy Leakage & Superior Pressure

You are a no-nonsense, honest officer. You have been transferred to a remote district to head a department that is notorious for its inefficiency and callousness. You find that the main cause of the poor state of affairs is the indiscipline of a section of employees. They do not work themselves and also disrupt the working of others. You first warned the troublemakers to mend their ways or else face disciplinary action. When the warning had little effect, you issued a show cause notice to the ringleaders. As a retaliatory measure, these troublemakers instigated a woman employee amongst them to file a complaint of sexual harassment against you with the Women’s Commission. The Commission promptly seeks your explanation. The matter is also publicized in the media to embarrass you further. Some of the options to handle this situation could be as follows: 1) Give your explanation to the Commission and go soft on the disciplinary action. 2) Ignore the Commission and proceed firmly with the disciplinary action. 3) Brief your higher-ups, seek directions from them and act accordingly. Suggest any other possible option(s). Evaluate all of them and suggest the best course of action, giving your reasons for it.

See how top AIR rankers answered this exact question

Instantly inspect real answer copies written by toppers under timed exam conditions.

VALUE ADDITION VAULT19,145+ Items

No coaching or ChatGPT ever cleared UPSC — only toppers did.

Struggling to remember exact facts, quotes & diagrams under exam pressure? Explore 19,145+ SC judgments, committee reports, keywords, and 1,717 redrawn vector diagrams mined straight from top AIR rankers' Mains booklets.

⚡ ~10% of 6,000+ topper copies (growing weekly!)Explore Topper Value Addition →
Paper:
GS-4
Section:
Case Studies Based on Public Sector Ethics
Year:
2013
Marks:
20

More on Transparency X RTI

Ethics

“Recent amendments to the Right to Information Act will have profound impact on the autonomy and independence of the Information Commission”. Discuss. The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe within a particular state is being questioned by various States. However, the power of States to withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of India.

202010 Marks
View →

“The Right to Information Act is not all about citizens’ empowerment alone, it essentially redefines the concept of accountability.” Discuss.

201810 Marks
View →

As a senior officer in the Finance Ministry, you have access to some confidential and crucial information about policy decisions that the Government is about to announce. These decisions are likely to have far-reaching impact on the housing and construction industry. If the builders have access to this information beforehand, they can make huge profits. One of the builders has done a lot of quality work for the Government and is known to be close to your immediate superior, who asks you to disclose this information to the said builder. 1) What are the options available to you? 2) Evaluate each of these options and choose the option which you would adopt, giving reasons.

201320 Marks
View →

You are a Public Information Officer (PIO) in a government department. You are aware that the RTI Act 2005 envisages transparency and accountability in administration. The act has functioned as a check on the supposedly arbitrary administrative behaviour and actions. However, as a PIO you have observed that there are citizens who filed RTI applications not for themselves but on behalf of such stakeholders who purportedly want to have access to information to further their own interests. At the same time there are these RTI activists who routinely file RTI applications and attempt to extort money from the decision makers. This type of RTI activism has affected the functioning of the administration adversely and also possibly jeopardises the genuineness of the applications which are essentially aimed at getting justice. What measures would you suggest to separate genuine and non-genuine applications? Give merits and demerits of your suggestions.

201720 Marks
View →

Related Questions (GS-4)