section 3(d) in the India n Patent Law, 1970. Discuss how it has been utilized by Supreme court in its judgment rejecting Novartis patent application for “Glivec”. Discuss briefly the pros and cons of
Patent Protection vs Public Health: Section 3(d) Anti-Evergreening, Compulsory Licensing
All UPSC Mains previous year questions mapped for Patent Protection vs Public Health: Section 3(d) Anti-Evergreening, Compulsory Licensing under Intellectual Property Rights IPR.
UPSC Mains Previous Year QuestionsShowing 2 PYQs
What is the present world scenario of intellectual property rights with respect to life materials? Although, India is second in the world to file patents, still only a few have been commercialized. Explain the reasons behind this less commercialization.
Topper Value Additions & Evidence Bank for Patent Protection vs Public Health: Section 3(d) Anti-Evergreening, Compulsory Licensing
Access 19,200+ curated quotes, committee reports, judgments, data points, and diagram redraws extracted directly from real UPSC Mains topper answer sheets.
Ready-to-use intro & conclusion hooks used by toppers.
ARC2, NITI Aayog, Law Commission & Economic Survey data.
Verified stats for GS1, GS2, GS3 & GS4 papers.
High-yield maps, flowcharts & schematics from topper copies.