GS-4 · of tribal and nomadic communities.

202520 marksQ7

Inspite of the ecological and social costs, the administration argues in favour of the said proposal by highlighting that this initiative addresses fundamental human rights as a critical welfare priority. Besides it, it fulfils the government’s duty to uplift and empower the poor through inclusive housing development. Further, these forest areas have become unsafe due to wild-animal threats and recurring human-wild life conflicts. Lastly, clearing forest-zones may help to curb anti-social elements allegedly using these areas as hideouts, thereby enhancing law and order.

⚡ Mains Ready Material

Loading Mains Ready Material...

Paper:
GS-4
Section:
of tribal and nomadic communities.
Year:
2025
Marks:
20

More on Ethical dilemmas in Public Administration

Ethics

Related Questions (GS-4)