GS-4 · Case Studies Based on Individual Morality

201820 marksQ3State Confidentiality vs Civic Conscience

Edward Snowden, a computer expert and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage Act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his “whistleblowing” by stating that he had a duty “to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them.” According to Snowden, the Government’s violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden’s actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case.

See how top AIR rankers answered this exact question

Instantly inspect real answer copies written by toppers under timed exam conditions.

VALUE ADDITION VAULT19,145+ Items

No coaching or ChatGPT ever cleared UPSC — only toppers did.

Struggling to remember exact facts, quotes & diagrams under exam pressure? Explore 19,145+ SC judgments, committee reports, keywords, and 1,717 redrawn vector diagrams mined straight from top AIR rankers' Mains booklets.

⚡ ~10% of 6,000+ topper copies (growing weekly!)Explore Topper Value Addition →
Paper:
GS-4
Section:
Case Studies Based on Individual Morality
Year:
2018
Marks:
20

More on Applied Ethics x Technology

Ethics

Related Questions (GS-4)